Q0 PATTERNS, how do they work?

Q: Does PATTERN scoring require all three colors of the MOTIF (PPG, PGP, GPP) have to match to get credit?

A: No, per section 10.5.2 PATTERN points are earned individually for each ARTIFACT with its color matched correctly. Matching all 3 colors in the MOTIF is not required to earn individual PATTERN points.

( Asked by 1000 answered Sep 22nd 25 )

Q1 Are points lost for ARTIFACTS that leave through the GATE?

Q: When I open the GATE do I lose points for the ARTIFACTS which roll out?

A: No, ARTIFACTS are scored for CLASSIFIED and OVERFLOW points per section 10.5.1 when they pass through the SQUARE to the RAMP. These points are earned whether the ARTIFACT remains on the RAMP or not. However, PATTERN points are scored based on ARTIFACTS on the RAMP at the end of AUTO and end of the MATCH. The PATTERN points will be assessed and given based on the ARTIFACTS on the RAMP at those times.

( Asked by 1000 answered Sep 22nd 25 )

Q2 MOTIF location

Q: Can we create a MOTIF anywhere on the RAMP for PATTERN points?

A: No. To earn PATTERN points the ARTIFACT color must match the color of the individual index which is defined by the MOTIF repeating in order 3 times starting from the GATE. Each individual index is specified by the MOTIF only for Locations 1-3, 4-6, and 7-9 on the RAMP starting from the GATE.

( Asked by 1000 answered Sep 22nd 25 )

Q3 BASE scoring – completely in?

Q: Do both ROBOTS need to be completely in the BASE ZONE to score fully returned to BASE points?

A: No. ROBOT Scoring Criteria for BASE points is listed in 10.5.3. For a ROBOT to be fully returned to BASE, it must be only supported by the TILE in the BASE ZONE and does not require a ROBOT to be completely in the tape lines. For example, A ROBOT fully supported by the TILE in the BASE ZONE that has parts overhanging past the BASE ZONE tape line would still earn BASE points.

( Asked by 1000 answered Sep 22nd 25 )

Q4 Marking ARTIFACTS

Q: Can a team mark ARTIFACTS to identify them if they are brought to events?

A: ARTIFACTS that are to be used in official matches at competition events should not have marks placed on the outside surfaces, as this could interfere with ROBOT vision systems. If marking is required for ARTIFACT identification, it is recommended to make multiple small markings inside each ARTIFACT with a permanent marker. Avoid using paint, as it can add mass to the ARTIFACTS.

( Asked by 1000 answered Sep 22nd 25 )

Q5 Human Players Holding Artifacts Over Loading Zone

Q: Per G434, each alliance cannot store more than 6 artifacts off of the field, and the orange box under G434 states that the intent of the rule is to prevent an alliance from starving the field of artifacts. However, would it be legal for human players to hold as many artifacts as physically possible over loading zone without incurring fouls? If not, what fouls would be applied?

A: Please see [Team Update 04](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/file/ftc/game/tu-04). If that does not answer your question, please rephrase and resubmit.

( Asked by 14584 answered Oct 3rd 25 )

Q6 Is traction force allowed?

Q: (Q1) Can I lift my wheels and use a “plate” under my robot to lift up my robot (and to allow a partner to park under me)? (Q2) Can I use a traction pad under my robot that contacts tiles and pushed down to help hold my robot in place?

A: Yes, as long as the “plate” or traction pad does not grab FIELD surfaces or generate airflow to provide downward suction as disallowed per !R208. A high-friction plate or pad flat against the tile is not considered “grabbing” the FIELD surface. Additionally, the ROBOT must not damage the TILES per !R201 or any other FIELD elements per !G412.

( Asked by 1000 answered Sep 22nd 25 )

Q7 Depot Descoring

Q: Can a robot descore artifacts scored in the opposing alliance depot without incurring fouls?

A: Per section 10.5.1, the DEPOT is not a protected zone, therefore either ALLIANCE can remove ARTIFACTS from either DEPOT during a MATCH.

( Asked by 14584 answered Sep 23rd 25 )

Q8 How to earn partial BASE point

Q: Q1: Does part of the robot inside the tape line earn partial BASE points? Q2: Does one of the wheels touching the tape line earn partial BASE points?

A: A1: No. If part of a ROBOT is only in the BASE ZONE, but the ROBOT is not at least partially supported by the BASE ZONE, it is not partially returned to BASE. A2: Yes. As indicated in the orange box in section 10.5.3, "the TILE in the BASE ZONE is the flooring surface bounded by the outside edge of the tape defining the BASE ZONE". A wheel touching the tape line would mean the ROBOT is in the BASE ZONE and partially supported by that TILE in the BASE ZONE and earn the ROBOT points for being partially returned to BASE.

( Asked by 12611 answered Sep 23rd 25 )

Q9 Robot Vertical Extension Limit Clarification

Q: R105 states "ROBOTS may expand beyond the STARTING CONFIGURATION but are still subject to sizing constraints relative to the ROBOT, based on the initial STARTING CONFIGURATION." R105c further states "ROBOTS may expand vertically up to 38 in." Assuming G415 is satisfied, can you confirm that the phrase "relative to the ROBOT" means that if the robot flipped on its side, that vertical extension allowance now means the robot could effectively extend horizontally relative to the field floor?

A: Yes. Per !R105 If a ROBOT reorients itself relative to its STARTING CONFIGURATION the ROBOT expansion limits also reorient (including the vertical expansion limit as noted by !R105C). If a ROBOT reorients relative to its starting configuration such that it's vertical dimension is now horizontal relative to the FIELD, this ROBOT's vertical extension would also now be measured horizontal relative to the FIELD. Note, legal ROBOT expansion is subject to !G415 being satisfied.

( Asked by 25620 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q10 ARTIFACT leaves the field

Q: Are there any penalties if an ARTIFACT accidentally leaves the field and strikes a member of the opposing alliance drive team or a referee?

A: No. However, if the ARTIFACT is intentionally ejected from the FIELD, !G406 applies, or if the ARTIFACT is launched with an extremely excessive amount of energy, !G409 part B applies.

( Asked by 12611 answered Sep 23rd 25 )

Q11 R105 Clarification

Q: A CHASSIS is 14 inches square. A MECHANISM extends 4 inches beyond a side of a CHASSIS. The MECHANISM retracts into the CHASSIS and then extends 4 inches beyond the opposite side of the CHASSIS. The ROBOT occupies no greater than 18 inches cubed at all times. Is this allowed?

A: [Team Update 03](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/ftc/game/tu-03) has been posted and adds additional clarifying images to !R105. The ROBOT at no time may be physically capable of extending beyond the expansion limit as described in !R105 and !G415. This rule defines the ROBOT's legal mechanical limits as it is built, not only what it does at any given instant during normal operation. The answer to your question depends on the hypothetical mechanism being described. If the mechanism cannot physically extend off "both sides of the CHASSIS" at the same time (as described in your question) it would not violate !R105. If the ROBOT has two mechanisms which are not mechanically linked, at inspection both mechanisms will be required to be simultaneously extended to their maximum mechanical extension and it will be determined whether the ROBOT is still within the expansion limits as described in !R105.

( Asked by 9999 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q12 Loading zone and secret tunnel clarification (G425 and G426)

Q: Our understanding is that Loading zones and secret tunnels are not restricted zones, meaning that any robot can grab ARTIFACTS from either Loading zone. G425 and G426 state that there are fouls for contact in those zones, regardless of which robot initiates contact. Can you confirm the following is correct: If a BLUE robot goes in the empty RED Loading zone and, after it is in, a RED robot follows in and makes contact, the BLUE robot gets a foul (i.e. RED gets +5 points)?

A: Your interpretation of rule !G426 is correct, in the described scenario, blue ROBOT would receive a MINOR FOUL.

( Asked by 20267 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q13 Gobilda GripForce Mecanum Wheels

Q: My team has been looking at getting new Mecanum wheels for our robot and started fundraising for them right before the season started. When we went to buy the Gobilda Mecanum wheels, we saw they only had the GripForce wheels available and have seen concerns about legality of the wheels. Are the GripForce wheels legal? We have not gotten ours to test them, but we haven’t seen real evidence of them damaging the tiles, only speculation from coaches and competitors online.

A: Per !R201 only materials which are known to damage the TILE floor are prohibited to be used as traction devices. The goBILDA GripForce Mecanum Wheels are not known to cause this damage and are not an explicitly prohibited material. However, all ROBOTS using traction devices (including those which are made from materials allowed per !R201) are still subject to !G412 and must not damage the TILES.

( Asked by 18147 answered Sep 23rd 25 )

Q14 RAMP Diverting

Q: Are we allowed to use a component to divert the ARTIFACTS coming out of a RAMP while we open the GATE. (For example, if we are RED team and are opening our own RED GATE, can we have a wall-like barrier attached to our robot to put in front of the RAMP to divert the ARTIFACT towards the middle of the field and away from the BLUE SECRET TUNNEL). Does this violate G425 (Keep out of opponent's SECRET TUNNEL) or G408 (No more than 3 at a time), particularly if there are more than 3 balls in the ramp?

A: We cannot rule absolutely on hypothetical ROBOT designs, but regardless of design, all ROBOTS need to follow the game rules during the MATCH. Regardless of the ROBOT'S design, the ROBOT might violate !G425 or !G408 as described during the MATCH. A ROBOT that contacts an opponent ROBOT while the ROBOT is in the opponent's SECRET TUNNEL ZONE would be in violation of !G425, regardless of which ROBOT initiates contact. A ROBOT that CONTROLS more than 3 ARTIFACTS at a time would be in violation of !G408. A stationary ROBOT that does not actively move itself or a MECHANISM is passively deflecting SCORING ELEMENTS, which is not considered CONTROL per the orange box in !G408. A ROBOT that actively moves itself or a MECHANISM to direct SCORING ELEMENTS to a preferred direction is considered CONTROL for the duration of the contact between the ROBOT and the SCORING ELEMENT per the definition of CONTROL in section 16.

( Asked by 20371 answered Sep 29th 25 )

Q15 Artifact Deflected Inside of Robot

Q: Q1. Would an ARTIFACT that is launched inside of a robot be considered controlled under G408 B? Q2. If an ARTIFACT launched by a Red alliance bot gets stuck within a Blue alliance bot, is Blue protected from G408 by G210? Q3. If an ARTIFACT launched by a Blue alliance bot gets stuck within a Blue alliance bot, is Blue protected by G408 B?

A: A1: Per the definition of CONTROL in section 16, CONTROL typically requires the the SCORING ELEMENT to be fully supported by the ROBOT or the ROBOT moving the SCORING ELEMENT in a preferred direction (i.e., herding). If the ARTIFACT is LAUNCHED and not in contact with the ROBOT it would not be supported and no longer be considered CONTROLLED. A2: Not necessarily. In order for a violation !G210 to be called the action by the red alliance would have to be "clearly aimed at forcing the opponent ALLIANCE to violate a rule". Unless, in the interpretation of the referee, the action was clearly aimed to force a rule violation !G210 would not be called. A3: No. A ROBOT that has an ARTIFACT stuck in or on it is typically considered in CONTROL of that ARTIFACT per the definition of CONTROL in section 16 Glossary regardless of where that ARTIFACT came from.

( Asked by 7420 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q16 Can we use a servo to physically limit expansion?

Q: R105 states, "ROBOTS must be physically constrained to fit within these limits without the use of software." Part of our robot could expand beyond the 18" limit, but it is attached to a servo that does not move beyond that limit. Even without power, the servo does not move in the direction that would allow the part to extend higher than 18". Does this count as a physical constraint, even though, if programmed differently, the servo could enable the part to exceed the limit?

A: No, using software to limit the position of a servo does not constitute a physical constraint. If the servo is capable of being moved by hand to a position that position is subject to the limits described by !R105. As described by the orange box below !R105, During inspection, each team will be asked to show... configurations at maximum mechanical extensions. Software limits are not sufficient to demonstrate maximum extensions.

( Asked by 18147 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q17 Will SCORING ELEMENTS that leave the FIELD ever be returned to a DRIVE COACH?

Q: In section 10.8 Other Logistics, it says - "SCORING ELEMENTS that leave the FIELD will be returned to the closest DRIVE TEAM member”. Per Table 10-1, a DRIVE COACH is a DRIVE TEAM member. Per G430, "DRIVE COACHES may not contact SCORING ELEMENTS, unless for safety purposes". Q1) If a DRIVE COACH is the nearest DRIVE TEAM member, would they be handed a scoring element, and would that force them to violate G430? Q2) Also, would someone busy driving be handed a SCORING ELEMENT?

A: Please see [Team Update 03](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/ftc/game/tu-03). If that does not answer your question, please rephrase and resubmit.

( Asked by 10723 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q18 G431 and G433: During match can you load ARTIFACTS into robot?

Q: G431: Once a MATCH starts, a DRIVE TEAM member inside the FIELD may not: (B) contact a SCORING ELEMENT in contact with a ROBOT G433: DRIVE TEAM members may only enter ARTIFACTS onto the FIELD as follows (D) only via the LOADING ZONE ...(ii) into a ROBOT that is in the LOADING ZONE. Can a human player be in contact with an ARTIFACT while placing it in the ROBOT or must the player drop the ARTIFACT into the ROBOT such that the ROBOT and player are not in contact with ARTIFACT simultaneously?

A: The DRIVE TEAM member should drop the ARTIFACT into the ROBOT such that the ROBOT and human are not both in contact with ARTIFACT simultaneously. A DRIVE TEAM member, including one acting as a HUMAN PLAYER, that loads an ARTIFACT into a ROBOT such that the human, the ARTIFACT, and the ROBOT simultaneously contact each other is in violation of !G431 part B. Tip: Make it obvious!

( Asked by 19410 answered Sep 23rd 25 )

Q19 Allowed tools for human players

Q: G433 prohibits DRIVE TEAM members from entering ARTIFACTS using a tool unless allowed under G302. Would they be allowed something like a clear plastic tube for guiding ARTIFACTS into the field? It is held by the DRIVE TEAM and A) it does not seem unsafe, B) it wouldn't be under 6ft in the air, C) it wouldn't communicate, D) being clear it wouldn't block visibility, and E) doesn't jam or interfere.

A: Please see [Team Update 03](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/ftc/game/tu-03). If that does not answer your question, please rephrase and resubmit.

( Asked by 10723 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q20 Clarification on R105 regarding flexible extensions

Q: R105 states that "During inspection, each team will be asked to show the ROBOT’S ... configurations at maximum mechanical extensions.", which includes flexible extensions. It's obvious to me that slides should be extended, and rollers should be spun, but flexible mechanisms seem less obvious. For example, if using a rubber band drum, should teams stretch the rubber band out to its limit, even if there is no reasonable way in-match for that motion to happen?

A: Per !R105, any extension beyond the maximum expansion limit during ROBOT operation is considered a violation of this rule - including flexible extensions. A flexible item (such as a rubber band) that during normal ROBOT operation would not violate the expansion limit, but potentially could be pulled and deformed by an external source to exceed the limit would not be considered in violation of !R105. Teams should be aware that ROBOTS must continue to comply with the expansion limits during the match as specified in !G414 and !G415. A ROBOT with a flexible item (such as a rubber band) that gets stretched past the expansion limit during a MATCH would be potentially be in violation of !G414 or !G415.

( Asked by 10723 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q21 Open gate during transition period

Q: If a robot ends the autonomous period while opening the gate, but artifacts start releasing after the auto buzzer chimes (and before teleop begins), will the team get motif points? At the time of the buzzer, the artifacts would be at the location for the motif points, and the robot would not be in motion.

A: ARTIFACTS that meet the criteria in 10.5.2 -- including that they are directly on the RAMP and retained by the GATE -- at the end of AUTO per 10.5 will be assessed for PATTERN points. If the GATE is opened at or before the end of AUTO, then the ARTIFACTS on the RAMP are not assessed for PATTERN points, as they are not retained by the GATE at the end of AUTO. Additionally, the orange box of !G403 states that operating the GATE after the end of AUTO but before the start of TELEOP is a strategic violation of this rule and subject to !G211 violations.

( Asked by 17036 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q22 Human Player during Auto

Q: Are human players allowed to interact with artifacts in their zone, without retrieving them, during the auto phase? (Are human players allowed to move the preset artifacts to a different location inside of the zone?)

A: No, !G432-B states that DRIVE TEAM members may only retrieve ARTIFACTS from the FIELD or move ARTIFACTS within the FIELD during TELEOP. Moving the ARTIFACTS that are staged in the LOADING ZONE during AUTO would be a violation of this rule. As a note, this question was asked before [Team Update 04](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/ftc/game/tu-04) was posted. Team Update 04 has updates to the rule wording compared to when the question was asked.

( Asked by 17036 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q23 Both alliances in the same secret tunnel during auto

Q: If a robot were to enter their secret tunnel during auto, and the opposing alliance is also attempting to enter the same secret tunnel, what penalties would be assessed according to G402 and G425?

A: A MAJOR FOUL would be assessed to a ROBOT that contacts an opposing ALLIANCE'S ROBOT that is completely within the opponent side of the FIELD per !G402-A. A MINOR FOUL would be assessed to the ROBOT in the opponent SECRET TUNNEL ZONE if contact is made with the opponent ROBOT per !G425.

( Asked by 17036 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q24 Pinning clarification

Q: What qualifies as preventing the movement of an opponent robot for pinning? Does the robot being pinned have to be completely unable to move? Or stuck in the same rough location?

A: !G422 states that a ROBOT is PINNING if it is preventing the movement of an opponent ROBOT by contact. This both requires contact from the PINNING robot and (as perceived by the referee) the PINNED ROBOT has its movement prevented. Once the PIN count starts the PINNED ROBOT may be able to move, but the PINNING ROBOT must meet the requirements in !G422 in order to stop the PIN count and avoid additional fouls. As a reminder, we cannot comment absolutely on hypothetical scenarios. The ultimate decision would be determined by the referee at your event, with the final call made by the Head Referee.

( Asked by 17036 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q25 Does bouncing the ARTIFACT count as LAUNCHING?

Q: In the glossary, LAUNCHING is defined as "shooting or throwing into the air". To bounce an ARTIFACT the game element is aimed towards the ground and not the air. Would bouncing be defined as LAUNCHING?

A: We're unsure if this question is referring to ROBOTS or DRIVE TEAM members bouncing ARTIFACTS, but some changes were made in TU03. Please see [Team Update 03](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/file/ftc/game/tu-combined). If that does not answer your question, please rephrase and resubmit.

( Asked by 14380 answered Sep 30th 25 )

Q26 Endgame Expansion

Q: During the endgame, does the allowable expansion stay relative to starting configuration as stated in R105? For example, If a robot tilts during endgame can it exceed the 18 inch width relative to the floor if it stays within the 18 inch width relative to the robots starting configuration?

A: We believe !Q9 answers your question. If it does not, please rephrase your question and resubmit.

( Asked by 16252 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q27 ARTIFACT Scoring Counted for AUTO and TELEOP

Q: In years past, a SCORING ELEMENT that was scored during AUTO and still present at the beginning of TELEOP was counted twice. Do ARTIFACTS scored during AUTO and still present at the beginning of TELEOP get scored again for TELEOP? "10.5.1 ARTIFACT Scoring Criteria − An ARTIFACT that passes through the SQUARE and transitions directly to the RAMP is considered CLASSIFIED."

A: As described in section 10.5 The determination of whether an ARTIFACT is CLASSIFIED or OVERFLOW is made as the ARTIFACT passes through the SQUARE. Assessment of ARTIFACTS as either CLASSIFIED or OVERFLOW occur throughout the MATCH and will be added to the score as they pass through the SQUARE. They will not be recounted again until they pass through the SQUARE additional times during the MATCH. As a friendly reminder, rules from previous seasons don't apply to the DECODE game.

( Asked by 18064 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q28 Returning to base - Are We allowed to pick up our alliances robots?

Q: When in endgame and trying to park in the base. Are we allowed to pick up our alliances robot to have both robots qualify for base points.

A: Section 10.5.3 lists the scoring criteria required to qualify for BASE points. As long as the criteria is met by the ROBOT, the points will be earned. As indicated in the orange box, support for a (lifted) ROBOT can come through another (lifting) ROBOT to the TILE in the BASE ZONE for full or partial support to qualify for BASE points.

( Asked by 31664 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q29 Modifiying GoBilda Motor Gear

Q: For our robot the team needs a 6000 rpm motor but we have only 1150 rpm ( 5203-2402-0005), the obvious option is to build and external gear using two (ore more) wheels to increase the speed but the students wants to replace the inside of the original gearbox bi removing the gears of the planetary gear and replacing them with a 3d printed stem the connects the output shaft of the yellow jacket motor to the REX shaft. As for R501 and R504 - A it is not so clear if such a change is legal or not

A: The orange box on rule !R501 clarifies that legal motors may be used with or without any legal compatible gearbox (e.g. also satisfying !R303 part C and any other applicable rules).

( Asked by 23644 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q30 Is SRS Hub legal for 2025-2026 FTC DECODE

Q: The SRS Hub is a sensor hub or coprocessor to aggregate sensor inputs. The manufacturer provides firmware. Under those conditions, the SRS Hub matches the requirement set in R702. The manual references explicitly the Digital Chicken Labs OctoQuad FTC Edition as an example of a legal device. According to Section 12, COTS items are commercially available to all teams. Ref: https://www.tindie.com/products/srsrobotics/srshub/

A: Yes, this CUSTOM CIRCUIT (as defined by !R613) does not appear to violate any rules so long as all other rules pertaining to its use are followed (e.g. !R702, !R619, etc.).

( Asked by 16481 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q31 Can you clarify how to qualify for Leave points?

Q: Rule 10.5.3 states "To qualify for LEAVE points, a ROBOT must move such that it is no longer over any LAUNCH LINE at the end of AUTO." Does this mean that a robot could move off of the launch line during AUTO then move back over a launch line to finish Auto and not qualify for LEAVE? Or does moving off of the launch line at any point during Auto qualify for LEAVE points?

A: Per section 10.5 assessment of LEAVE scoring occurs at the end of AUTO. A ROBOT that moves off the LAUNCH LINE and then back so that they end AUTO over the LAUNCH LINE would not receive LEAVE points.

( Asked by 8733 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q32 Reprogramming vision coprocessors

Q: Q1: Are teams permitted to use coprocessors such as the Orange Pi 3 with custom software such as PhotonVision https://photonvision.org/ installed for this year's vision challenges? Q2: If custom coprocessors are not allowed, are teams allowed to modify Limelight 3A devices to install custom system-level software like PhotonVision?

A: A1: No, the Orange Pi 3 is not a supported programmable vision coprocessor listed in !R703. A2: You are only allowed to modify the Limelight 3A in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations (updating supplied firmware, etc). Performing actions such as adding/removing/modifying operating system software, application software, or performing hardware modifications not officially supported by Limelight makes the device no longer a Limelight 3A device and voids legality per !R703.

( Asked by 12087 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q34 Does the robot need to start all the way up against a wall at the beginning of the match?

Q: Does the robot need to start all the way up against a wall at the beginning of the match?

A: Per rule !G304 B, ROBOTS must be touching either its own ALLIANCE GOAL or the FIELD perimeter. Note that the DEPOT is a LAUNCH LINE that the ROBOT can start over.

( Asked by 31664 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q35 Close gate from top?

Q: The orange box after Rule G413 indicates that no closing force (i.e. pulling) should be applied to the gate. These two "closing force" and "pulling" are not the same thing. As it is legal to push the gate at the bottom to open it, would it not also be legal to push the gate above the fulcrum to apply closing force without "grabbing", "grasping", "attaching to", "becoming entangled with", or "suspending from" the gate as long as G418 is not deemed to be violated?

A: Please see [Team Update 03](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/file/ftc/game/tu-combined). If that does not answer your question, please rephrase and resubmit.

( Asked by 27470 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q36 Can an artifact be introduced onto another artifact such that it rolls off into the field?

Q: G433(D)(i) states artifacts can be placed on the field by "directly placing the ARTIFACT into the LOADING ZONE." Q1: If the human player placed an artifact on top of another one already in the LZ so that it rolled off and out into the field, would this be allowed? It would not seem to violate part (B) because human player is not directly rolling the artifact. Q2: Would dropping onto the existing artifact be allowed (since "dropping" into robots is required to load them per the answer to Q18).

A: Please see [Team Update 03](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/file/ftc/game/tu-03) for revised wording on !G433. A1: The LOADING ZONE is defined as an infinitely tall volume bounded by the tape lines. Placing an ARTIFACT on top of another ARTIFACT qualifies as being placed into the LOADING ZONE. However, teams should be careful not to violate rule !G433. A2: While it is difficult to comment on hypotheticals, teams should be careful not to violate !G433 while entering ARTIFACTS onto the field and !G432 while moving ARTIFACTS in the FIELD.

( Asked by 25620 answered Oct 14th 25 )

Q37 Use of "Grip Sprays" or stick glue in regards to R205

Q: A device we are considering using on the ROBOT is a wheel covered lightly with a thin layer of silicone stick spray and/or stick glue to increase grip with ARTIFACTS. This system would leave a very small but noticeable amount of residue on ARTIFACTS and other parts of the field with prolonged contact; however, this residue would not be enough to delay field start or damage parts of the field, nor would such residue hinder the performance of other ROBOTS. Does this device comply with R205?

A: A grip spray or stick glue that leaves residue on the ARTIFACTS or FIELD elements would be considered damaging the FIELD and would be a violation of rule !R205. In addition, if the residue is left during the MATCH, rule !G407 would likely apply. The residue left on the ARTIFACT may alter the ARTIFACTS interactions with FIELD elements, as well as other ROBOTS interacting with the ARTIFACTS, thus considering the ARTIFACTS damaged.

( Asked by 30003 answered Sep 24th 25 )

Q38 What does G430 prevent?

Q: I'm struggling to understand the purpose/intent behind G430. Q1: Does it prevent (particularly student) DRIVE COACHES from using scoring elements to help setup the robot? Q2: Does it prevent DRIVE COACHES from removing scoring elements from the robot, such as after the match is done? Q3: Does this rule incentivize/allow drivers to attempt to tag the opponent's DRIVE COACH with an ARTIFACT during match setup, for 5 points per instance?

A: Rules in section 11.4, including !G430, pertain to gameplay once a MATCH begins. !G430 prevents a DRIVE COACH from contacting SCORING ELEMENTS, unless for safety purposes, during the MATCH. A1: No, if setting up prior to the start of the MATCH this would not be a violation. A2: No, if removing after the end of the MATCH this would not be a violation. A3: No. !G211 will apply to a DRIVE TEAM member if they are throwing ARTIFACTS at the DRIVER COACH from an opposing ALLIANCE before the MATCH starts. !G202, !G210, and !G211 will apply if this action occurs during the MATCH.

( Asked by 12087 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q39 Re-introduction of artifacts shot outside of field back into the match

Q: A robot shoots an artifact that goes outside of the field perimeter. Q1: Can an alliance member (or a person on the field) retrieve the artifact and give it to the human player for re-introduction into the field? Q2: If yes, which alliance does the said artifact now belong to? Q3: If not, can we assume that artifacts that go outside of the field (by any means) can't be re-introduced into the match?

A: A1: A DRIVER or HUMAN PLAYER may retrieve an ARTIFACT that has left the FIELD only if the ARTIFACT is within reach of that DRIVE TEAM member without them leaving the ALLIANCE AREA per !G428. ARTIFACTS that are not within reach of the DRIVE TEAM will be returned by FIELD STAFF to the closest available DRIVER or HUMAN PLAYER per Section 10.8. A2: The ARTIFACT should then be in possession of the ALLIANCE nearest to where it left the FIELD and should be returned following !G430, !G433, and !G434. A3: N/A

( Asked by 23312 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q40 ROBOTS Sending Artifacts to HUMAN PLAYER

Q: Are these actions legal? 1) A robot outside a LAUNCH ZONE intentionally causes an ARTIFACT to roll (no LAUNCHING) to their own LOADING ZONE where their HUMAN PLAYER stops it and removes it from the field. 2) A robot in a LAUNCH ZONE LAUNCHES an ARTIFACT towards their own LOADING ZONE where their HUMAN PLAYER stops it and removes it from the field.

A: We cannot comment absolutely on hypothetical situations. While there are no rules that specifically disallow these actions as described teams should be careful to read and follow !G416 for limitations around LAUNCHING and !G432 for limitations around DRIVE TEAM members retrieving and moving ARTIFACTS from the FIELD.

( Asked by 19743 answered Sep 25th 25 )

Q41 HUMAN PLAYER Rearranging ARTIFACTS in LOADING ZONE

Q: May a HUMAN PLAYER rearrange ARTIFACTS in their LOADING ZONE without removing the ARTIFACTS from the FIELD (subject to G431, G432, and G433)? If so, does the off-field storage limit affect this in any way?

A: A DRIVE TEAM member may rearrange ARTIFACTS in their LOADING ZONE with restrictions listed in !G432. ARTIFACTS held "out of play" in the LOADING ZONE by a HUMAN PLAYER is a violation of !G434. Please see [Team Update 04](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/file/ftc/game/tu-combined).

( Asked by 19743 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q42 Confusion about mechanical locks and Endgame

Q: 11.4.2 G404 clearly states that we must hit pause on our driver station to stop power to the robot. Q1:Robots are required to have mechanical extension limits, but what about after we extend? In the scenario that a robot expands upwards, and does not have a mechanical lock stopping the robot from falling down under its own weight, what should happen? Q2: Can the refs allow those robots to stay powered, and then drive away from each other and then be paused and removed from the field?

A: A1: !G404 states ROBOTS must no longer have powered movement after the end of TELEOP. Teams should consider this limitation while designing their ROBOTS especially while attempting to earn BASE points. Per section 10.8 “Once the MATCH is over and the Head REFEREE or their designee determines that the FIELD and FIELD STAFF are ready, they will signal for DRIVE TEAMS to stop their ROBOTS.” After teams have pressed stop on their controller, the robot may experience uncontrolled movement (“falling down”) unless there is a mechanical lock (like a ratcheting wrench/device). A2: Teams must be prepared to remove their ROBOTS from the FIELD without being driven and additionally follow !G101 while retrieving ROBOTS from the FIELD. At the discretion of the Head REFEREE and FIELD Staff, some events may ask teams to re-enable and drive their robots to facilitate safe and timely field reset.

( Asked by 18699 answered Oct 23rd 25 )

Q44 Blue robot over their gate, red robot in their secret tunnel - contact

Q: If a blue robot is over the blue gate (not within red's secret tunnel), and a red robot is within their red secret tunnel, and contact occurs which team is penalized? G424 - Gate Zone and G425 Secret Tunnel both state "regardless of who initiates the contact"

A: The red ROBOT will receive a MINOR FOUL for contacting blue while the blue ROBOT is in blue's GATE ZONE per !G424. !G425 does not apply in this scenario, as red is in the red SECRET TUNNEL ZONE, and a ROBOT is not protected by !G425 in their own SECRET TUNNEL ZONE.

( Asked by 13474 answered Sep 29th 25 )

Q45 High Speed Air Flow

Q: Is the use of a motor powered ducted fan to direct a high speed flow of air in violation of Rule R207 (*No air power on the ROBOT)? If no "closed air devices" are used, is there any other rule that prohibits the use of directing air flow, assuming no other game or robot rules are violated?

A: We believe the clarifications to !R207 as shown in [Team Update 05](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/ftc/game/tu-05) answers your question. If it does not, please rephrase your question and resubmit. Per !R207-B ROBOTS may not use any device which creates high-speed airflow.

( Asked by 24079 answered Oct 9th 25 )

Q47 G404 and 10.5.3 Clarification | Spring Powered Release

Q: We're not sure how to interpret G404 and 10.5.3 "Returned to Base" scoring criteria. Could you please clarify? If a ROBOT has a mechanical system that causes a mechanism to release and therefore launch the ROBOT into the air when the STOP button is pressed at the buzzer, would the ROBOT violate G404, and would the ROBOT qualify for being fully returned the base, assuming the ROBOT becomes airborne and unsupported by the field during the buzzer via releasing the mechanism?

A: The orange box on !G404 clarifies that movement due to inertia or gravity does not count as powered movement; in this case no violation has occurred. Furthermore, the second condition for BASE points defined in section 10.5.3 requires support (either partially or completely) by the TILE in the BASE ZONE - a ROBOT that is airborne and unsupported by the TILE cannot qualify for BASE points.

( Asked by 30003 answered Sep 29th 25 )

Q48 G434: Do ARTIFACTS in DRIVE TEAM hand count towards storage limit?

Q: G434: "...each ALLIANCE may not store more than 6 ARTIFACTS off the FIELD..." Do ARTIFACTS in the DRIVE TEAM hands count towards the limit of 6 off the FIELD? When removing an ARTIFACT from the LOADING ZONE, at what point is a DRIVE TEAM member considered to have placed the ARTIFACT in storage (i.e. is it when lifted from the FIELD, held in hand outside of FIELD perimeter, or placed in the ALLIANCE AREA)?

A: Keep in mind this question was posted before the answer to !Q5 was published. We believe !Q5 answers your question. Please see [Team Update 04](https://ftc-resources.firstinspires.org/file/ftc/game/tu-04). If that does not answer your question, please rephrase and resubmit.

( Asked by 19410 answered Oct 6th 25 )

Q49 Modifying Gearboxes

Q: Following on from question 29, we have a commercial legal gearbox for a legal DC motor and we want to transform it (only mechanically) to a new gear ratio (1:1 in our case). Is that allowed per the R501 orange box?

A: Yes. !R501 permits legal motors to be used with or without included gearboxes, and teams may also use any gearbox (even custom-made or custom-modified gearboxes) with the motor if the new gearbox does not violate any other rules (i.e., !R205, !R301, etc)

( Asked by 23644 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q50 G418 Clarification

Q: If an ARTIFACT was to be released from the RAMP by a ROBOT opening their GATE, and then the ROBOT was to contact the same ARTIFACT before it contacts the floor, with it contacting another ARTIFACT that is on the RAMP at the same time, would this violate rule G418, or any other rule?

A: If the ARTIFACT contacted by the ROBOT is not on (supported by) the RAMP and is not CONTROLLED (fully supported or being moved by the ROBOT in a preferred direction) by the ROBOT, then G418 does not apply for the ARTIFACT contacted by the ROBOT or the ARTIFACT still on the RAMP under !G418. It is unclear if any other rules are violated in this scenario, such as !G408 or !G425.

( Asked by 23849 answered Oct 6th 25 )

Q52 Is the robot able to bounce outside the launch zone?

Q: If bouncing and launching are 2 different things. Is the robot able to bounce outside the launch zone by aiming the Artifact downwards or at a lower trajectory, one which would never enter the goal?

A: LAUNCHING is defined in section 16 as shooting or throwing into the air. This is regardless of the direction the SCORING ELEMENT is shot into the air (including down). Based on dictionary definitions, "bouncing" occurs when the ARTIFACT strikes a surface (such as the TILES) and rebounds. The "bouncing" is a subsequent reaction to an initial velocity imparted on the ARTIFACT that was initiated by gravity (dropping/falling), by force (LAUNCHING), or by a combination of force (LAUNCHING) and gravity (falling). If the initial velocity derives from the ARTIFACT being dropped or falling, no LAUNCHING has occurred, even if "bouncing" occurs during later ARTIFACT motion. If the ROBOT imparts velocity on the SCORING ELEMENT through the air in any direction, it has been LAUNCHED, regardless of subsequent reactions such as "bouncing." A ROBOT that LAUNCHES ARTIFACTS outside a LAUNCH ZONE or while not overlapping a LAUNCH LINE is subject to !G416 violations.

( Asked by 14380 answered Oct 6th 25 )

Q53 Does G421 apply to your alliance partner during endgame?

Q: G421 states no deliberate tipping or attaching to other robots. Does this apply to your alliance partner to ensure the base park in endgame?

A: No, !G421 only applies when a ROBOT deliberately attaches to, tips, or entangles with an opponent ROBOT.

( Asked by 14380 answered Oct 6th 25 )

Q54 Definition of reoriented robot

Q: Should a robot's orientation be measured based on the orientation of its chassis and wheels? If so, if the robot's chassis is rotated 90º to the right, then its orientation will rotate with that, correct? (As pertaining to the subject of Q9)

A: Yes, per !R105 sizing constrains are relative to the ROBOT based on the initial STARTING CONFIGURATION. If a ROBOT rotates itself relative to the STARTING CONFIGURATION the expansion limits also rotate with the ROBOT.

( Asked by 17036 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q55 Horizontal limits during the last 20 seconds of the game.

Q: Can our robot exceed the 18 inch horizontal limit during the last 20 seconds of the game?

A: No. !G414 horizontal expansion limits are enforced the same throughout the entire MATCH.

( Asked by 13217 answered Oct 6th 25 )

Q56 Using an april tag on team shirt design

Q: Our team wants to use an april tag on their team t-shirt design. The april tag id wouldn't be in the same family of any the game element ids. We are thinking the design would be on the rear of the shirt and so wouldn't be visible while the players are facing the field. Would there be any rule or judgement against this?

A: !G302 limits what can be brought or worn to the FIELD. A shirt with an AprilTag potentially could interfere with sensing capabilities of ROBOTS and, if worn to the FIELD, would be considered a violation of !G302-E.

( Asked by 17230 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q57 ROBOT SIGNS indicate your ALLIANCE

Q: Rule R402 D mentions that "folds" are allowed, but it does not provide specific details about the permissible type or angle of a fold. Would it be legal to use a single panel with a slight inward bend of approximately 150 degrees, as long as the portion displaying the number and alliance color fully meets the size and visibility requirements? If bending is allowed, can the entire bent panel be considered a single continuous panel?

A: As long as the ROBOT SIGNS adhere to the rules within [Section 12.4](https://ftc.game/cm-html#_Toc210200121), there is no requirement that the physical backing that contains the ROBOT SIGN be planar. However, all ROBOT SIGNS must meet the visibility requirements as outlined in the orange box of !R401 and each sign should be approximately planar to ensure INSPECTORS and FIELD STAFF agree it meets the visibility requirements (e.g., determining signs are 90 degrees apart).

( Asked by 25538 answered Oct 9th 25 )

Q58 Can artifacts handled by a robot extend outside of the 18”x18”x18” limit during a match?

Q: R101 states that a “pre-loaded SCORING ELEMENT may extend outside the starting size constraint.” This of course is at the match start. We find nothing in the Game Manual to suggest that artifacts are not permitted to extend outside of the 18”x18”x18” limit during a match and while being handled (and/or possessed) by a robot. Is this a correct interpretation of the rules?

A: Yes, this interpretation is correct. SCORING ELEMENTS are not considered part of the ROBOT per the definition of ROBOT section 16 and are not included as part of that STARTING CONFIGURATION in !R101 and the expansion limits in !G414 and !G415.

( Asked by 13643 answered Oct 6th 25 )

Q61 Shooting ARTIFACT inside GOAL

Q: If a ROBOT was to shoot an ARTIFACT through the top of the triangle shaped gap between the corrugated plastic part of the CLASSIFIER and the lower part of the GOAL, under the metal beams of the GOAL, causing the ARTIFACT to enter the lower part of the GOAL, getting it stuck there, would there be any penalty involved?

A: If this action is deemed deliberate, it is a violation of !G405. If this action is not deliberate, no rules have been violated. The ultimate decision on if this is deliberate would be determined by the REFEREE at your event, with the final call made by the Head REFEREE.

( Asked by 23849 answered Oct 6th 25 )

Q62 Clarification on G402 vs. G426 Interaction During Autonomous

Q: During AUTONOMOUS, if a Red ALLIANCE ROBOT crosses the FIELD into the Blue Aliiance's side of the field, enters the Red ALLIANCE’s LOADING ZONE, and contact occurs between two ROBOTS, Red and Blue, inside that zone, which rule applies? Does the Red Aliiance recieve a Major Foul for violating G402 and the Blue Alliance recieves a Minor Foul for violating G426, or only the Red Alliance recieves a Major Foul for G402 since Red initiated the illegal interaction?

A: A MAJOR FOUL would be assessed to the red ALLIANCE ROBOT that contacts a blue ALLIANCE ROBOT that is completely within the opponent side of the FIELD per !G402-A. A MINOR FOUL would be assessed to the blue ALLIANCE ROBOT in the opponent LOADING ZONE if contact is made while either ROBOT is in the opponent's LOADING ZONE, regardless of who initiates contact per !G426.

( Asked by 22993 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q63 Artifacts in the alliance area

Q: There were six pre-staged artifacts (4 purple, 2 green) in the Alliance Area at the beginning of the game. Can the team maintain a different color composition during the tele-ops, for example, 6 purple and zero green?

A: Yes. There are no rules that regulate color composition of the 6 ARTIFACTS out of play during the MATCH. TEAMS should make sure to follow !G434 for limitations of out of play ARTIFACTS during the MATCH.

( Asked by 369 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q64 Legal gamepad repairs

Q: R903 implies that gamepads must be "electrically unmodified", but does not specify what that means. What kind of repairs may be performed on controllers without violating R903? For example, if a PS4 controller's Micro USB port breaks, can it be replaced with a new identical port? What about a third-party replacement port? What about a different kind of port, such as USB-C?

A: Making a repair to a controller such that is identical in performance and specification would not be considered a modification to electronics. Changing a port from Micro USB to USB-C would be considered a modification to the electronics and would be disallowed per !R903.

( Asked by 12087 answered Oct 15th 25 )

Q65 Preloading robots with corresponding sequence

Q: Can you preload the robot with the color sequence matching April Tags for Automn? It is not clear when does the April Tag announces the color sequence if the Teams could preload the balls in the according color sequence.

A: No. Per Section 9.6, the OBELISK is randomized by the FIELD STAFF after the DRIVE TEAM has setup for the MATCH (!G304) which will determine which face of the OBELISK will face towards the FIELD. It is a violation of !G401 if DRIVE TEAM members interact with a ROBOT or OPERATOR CONSOLE after FIELD STAFF have begun the randomization process.

( Asked by 8487 answered Oct 7th 25 )

Q67 How do reorientations to starting configuration impact R105 and G414?

Q: What if the chasis (i.e. all 4 wheels) aren't on the ground when in the starting position? Is it just that a robot at maximum extension and in its starting configuration needs to fit inside the 18" cube? If a robot can tilt so the chasis is at an angle at starting configuration, is maximum extension measured at that orientation? Therefore, if the robot fits in the sizing cube at that orientation then it passes R105 and G414, even if it is over 18" when it lowers all 4 wheels to the floor to move

A: A ROBOT that has a STARTING CONFIGURATION that is different than the orientation that is used for the rest of the MATCH (e.g., tilted at an angle) could potentially have a dimension that measures longer than 18 in. when measured parallel to the TILES and still be in compliance with !G414. With that being said, keep in mind that there are multiple rules that the ROBOT needs to follow regards to ROBOT size, extensions, and STARTING CONFIGURATION. Per !R101, the STARTING CONFIGURATION is the physical configuration in which a ROBOT starts a MATCH. Per !R102, in the STARTING CONFIGURATION ROBOTS must be fully self-supported. !R105 states that the sizing constraints are based on the initial STARTING CONFIGURATION. Per !R105, during the inspection process the team will be asked to show the ROBOT in it's STARTING CONFIGURATION and at maximum mechanical extensions (measured based on that STARTING CONFIGURATION) to show that it meets the criteria listed. We cannot rule absolutely on hypothetical ROBOT designs, and the final decision as to legality of a particular ROBOT lies with the Lead ROBOT Inspector (LRI) at each event.

( Asked by 27470 answered Oct 15th 25 )

Q69 Does the extended 4 bar odometery pods count to your sizing box?

Q: The rules states you can’t be outside your 18 inch sizing box during the start of the match. As the odometry pods are mechanically being stopped from expanding by the floor. During inspection does the 4 bar odometry extension count to your 18 inches or 38 inches extension at endgame?

A: Under !R101 and !R102, the ROBOT is inspected for size constraints based on its STARTING CONFIGURATION. The ROBOT'S STARTING CONFIGURATION is the physical configuration in which it starts the MATCH. If, in this position, the odometry pod(s) rest on the floor such that the weight of the ROBOT and the normal force of the floor cause the odometry pod(s) to contract, this is the point at which !R101 is inspected. Provided the ROBOT is within the 18 inches at this point, it is compliant with !R101. Note that if the odometry pod(s) expand, e.g., due to the ROBOT changing orientation, the ROBOT is still subject to in-MATCH sizing constraints per !G415.

( Asked by 14380 answered Oct 14th 25 )

Q70 Inspire Awards

Q: Rule A214 states that you can only win ONE first place Inspire Award in qualifying tournaments. Does that mean if you win first place Inspire at your qualifying tournament you CANNOT win a first place Inspire at the next levels of advancement which would be a state championship or a World Championship?

A: No, the team would still be eligible to win at the next levels of advancement. !A214 only restricts a team that wins 1st place Inspire Award at a League Tournament (LT) or Qualifying Tournament (QT) from winning at additional League Tournaments (LT) or Qualifying Tournaments (QT). It does not restrict a team from winning at the next levels of advancement such as a State or Regional Championship, or the *FIRST* Championship.

( Asked by 12682 answered Oct 15th 25 )

Q71 Clarification on Award considerations

Q: The game manual says outreach events done after January 1, 2025 are eligible for judging consideration. Does that mean if your season last year extended past January 2025 due to advancement to your state or the FIRST Championship those outreach events done before those competitions can be used as outreach events for the Decode season?

A: Yes. Outreach done after January 1, 2025 is considered part of the current DECODE season regardless of whether a team competed in additional events after January for the previous season.

( Asked by 12682 answered Oct 15th 25 )

Q72 Pushing out of LAUNCH ZONE while shooting?

Q: If a team is about to shoot at the goal, but is pushed out of the LAUNCH ZONE right before the ARTIFACT is released from the robot (in such a way that the players cannot react in time to prevent launching), does this incur a G416 penalty on the shooting alliance? Or would this incur a G210 penalty on the pushing alliance for forcing the shooting alliance to break rule G416.

A: We cannot comment absolutely on hypothetical scenarios. The ultimate decision would be determined by the REFEREE at your event, with the final call made by the Head REFEREE. Defense is not illegal. Offensive ROBOTS are responsible for their LAUNCHED ARTIFACTS and should always strive to LAUNCH ARTIFACTS in compliance with !G416. For !G210 to be called, the pushing action must be perceived by the REFEREE to be "clearly aimed at forcing the opponent ALLIANCE to violate a rule." If the pushing action was determined by the REFEREE to not be a violation of !G210, then a !G416 would be called on the pushed ROBOT.

( Asked by 19410 answered Oct 14th 25 )

Q73 Is faux leather allowed?

Q: Is faux leather permitted, as it is not derived from animals?

A: Yes. Faux leather is not considered an "animal based material" disallowed by !R203-J and is allowed on the ROBOT as long as it is used in a way that does not violate any ROBOT construction rules.

( Asked by 30686 answered Oct 14th 25 )

Q74 Do visible marks on tiles constitute R201 damage to Field Tiles?

Q: Can you provide clarity on the threshold for damage to a floor tile. Scenario: Our team entered an a robot in an official scrimmage with custom traction wheels. During play the traction wheels left visible scuff marks on the foam tiles. Field staff (FTA & Referee) closely examined the marks and provisionally allowed the robot to continue play as no field tape was damaged, no foam was being removed from the tiles and no wheel material was being deposited without comment on tournament legality

A: We cannot comment about all hypothetical situations. Small, occasional markings on the TILE are permissible. However, routine marking on the TILE, any marking that in the judgement of the REFEREE changes the gameplay properties of the TILE, or any markings on the TILE that resemble taped lines may be considered FIELD damage under !G412.

( Asked by 11308 answered Oct 14th 25 )

Q75 G421 Clarification

Q: Robot A drives into Robot B. A has a wedge mechanism that allows them to slightly tip B by a few degrees, allowing A to push B easier; B has less contact between their wheels and the ground for the wedge on A has lifted them slightly up. After A has backed off, B is able to drive freely. Is this a violation of rule G421; B is able to drive properly and the definition of "tip" is unclear in the Game Manual, so would this small tip count as a "tip" in the Game Manual, specifically in Example A?.

A: We cannot comment absolutely on all hypothetical scenarios and the ultimate decision will be made by the Head REFEREE at the event. !G421 prevents deliberately tipping an opponent ROBOT, regardless of the amount of tipping. Some tipping is expected during normal ROBOT-to-ROBOT gameplay and will not be penalized under !G421. However, any efforts to deliberately tip an opponent ROBOT, regardless of if the ROBOT fully tips over, are in violation of !G421. A ROBOT design that includes features that are perceived to aid in tipping other ROBOTS will be included in factors the Head REFEREE uses to determine if tipping that occurs on the FIELD is deliberate. If the tipping is CONTINUOUS, the MAJOR FOUL and RED CARD violation clause would apply.

( Asked by 23849 answered Oct 15th 25 )

Q76 Are external monitors permitted?

Q: Is using an external HDMI monitor, powered over the 5 volt connection and connected to the control hub HDMI port, permitted during a match? Screens have been banned in previous years, but I can find nothing banning them this year.

A: Yes, External HDMI monitors are a CUSTOM CIRCUIT as defined by !R613, and must follow rules for CUSTOM CIRCUITS (namely !R613, !R618, !R619, and so on).

( Asked by 12087 answered Oct 15th 25 )

Q77 Launch lines

Q: Does a robot need to be over a launch line or in the launch zone to score an artifact? This seems to be implied, but not specifically stated.

A: Per !G416, a ROBOT must be inside a LAUNCH ZONE or overlapping a LAUNCH LINE to LAUNCH an ARTIFACT.

( Asked by 27609 answered Oct 14th 25 )

Q79 Is taking the encoder off of a motor permitted?

Q: Is it permitted to remove the encoder from a motor, to reduce the space it takes up? Or, to rephrase: is the encoder part of the motor that must not be electrically modified, or is the encoder its own part that can be independently modified like a gearbox?

A: No. Removing the encoder from a motor is not an allowed modification per !R504.

( Asked by 12087 answered Oct 15th 25 )